<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atonement &#8211; A Movie Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottwilliamfoley.com/2008/06/05/atonement-a-movie-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottwilliamfoley.com/2008/06/05/atonement-a-movie-review/</link>
	<description>~Provoking the Imagination~</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottwilliamfoley</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamfoley.com/2008/06/05/atonement-a-movie-review/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottwilliamfoley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamfoley.wordpress.com/?p=307#comment-277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad you enjoyed the review!  I haven&#039;t read Atonement.  I&#039;ve read The Cement Garden and Amsterdam.  The Cement Garden wasn&#039;t my cup of tea at all.  Amsterdam simply didn&#039;t interest me that much.  That said, with what little I&#039;ve read of McEwan, I do appreciate his style and craft.  Though I don&#039;t enjoy his content, he&#039;s an expert at the art of writing.

I may have to give Atonement a read, however, since you seem to think highly of it!

Thanks for dropping by!

~Scott]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you enjoyed the review!  I haven&#8217;t read Atonement.  I&#8217;ve read The Cement Garden and Amsterdam.  The Cement Garden wasn&#8217;t my cup of tea at all.  Amsterdam simply didn&#8217;t interest me that much.  That said, with what little I&#8217;ve read of McEwan, I do appreciate his style and craft.  Though I don&#8217;t enjoy his content, he&#8217;s an expert at the art of writing.</p>
<p>I may have to give Atonement a read, however, since you seem to think highly of it!</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by!</p>
<p>~Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mysterycreature1</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamfoley.com/2008/06/05/atonement-a-movie-review/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mysterycreature1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamfoley.wordpress.com/?p=307#comment-276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out of interest, have you read the book? I know that you say you have read some of them, but I ask because I found atonement to be an astonishing book - wish compared to his other books was miles ahead. 

Anyway, I though I&#039;d recommended it - because whilst the film IS good, I found the book to be much darker, deeper and ambiguous than the movie interpretation!

Nice review btw!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of interest, have you read the book? I know that you say you have read some of them, but I ask because I found atonement to be an astonishing book &#8211; wish compared to his other books was miles ahead. </p>
<p>Anyway, I though I&#8217;d recommended it &#8211; because whilst the film IS good, I found the book to be much darker, deeper and ambiguous than the movie interpretation!</p>
<p>Nice review btw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

